PDFluent
vs. iText

iText is a long-established Java/.NET PDF library. PDFluent adds what iText lacks: PDF rendering, XFA form support, WebAssembly, and multi-language bindings.
 PDFluentiText
PDF RenderingYesNot supported
XFA FormCalcYesNot supported

Feature comparison

Core FeaturesPDFluentiText
PDF Parsing
PDF Rendering (to image/screen)iText has no rendering engine
Text Extraction
AcroForms
XFA Forms — StaticRequires separate pdfXFA add-onPartial
XFA Forms — Dynamic Reflow
FormCalc Execution
PDF/A Validation & Conversion
PDF/UA Compliance
Digital Signatures (PAdES)
OCR
ZUGFeRD / Factur-X
PDF Merge / Split
RedactionPartial
Technology & PlatformPDFluentiText
Written in RustiText is Java / C#
WebAssembly (runs in browser)
Java / JVMiText's primary platform
.NETVia C API
Python bindings
Node.js bindings
C API
Mobile SDK (iOS / Android)

Strengths at a glance

Where PDFluent leads
PDF Rendering

iText cannot render PDFs to images or screen. PDFluent can. This matters for preview thumbnails, document review tools, and any visual workflow.

XFA Support

iText's pdfXFA add-on handles XFA flattening only. PDFluent supports dynamic reflow, FormCalc scripting, and XFA 3.3 form processing.

WebAssembly

PDFluent's WASM package (@pdfluent/sdk-wasm 1.0.0: 3.8 MB with Brotli, measured 2026-09-16) lets you process PDFs entirely in the browser without a server round-trip. iText is JVM-only.

Language reach

PDFluent has bindings for Python, Node.js, C, and WASM. iText is Java and .NET only.

Cold start performance

Rust has no runtime to start first. JVM startup adds latency to every cold invocation — a real cost in serverless environments.

Transparent pricing

PDFluent pricing is public. iText commercial deals require a sales call.

Where iText leads
Java ecosystem maturity

Years of Maven artifacts, Spring integrations, Jakarta EE support, and Java-native tooling. If your stack is JVM, iText fits naturally.

AGPL free tier

For open-source projects that can accept the copyleft obligation, iText 9 is genuinely free. No free-tier limitations on feature set.

Battle-tested at scale

iText runs in production across banking, government, and legal sectors. The edge cases have been found and fixed.

iText 7 plugin architecture

A broad ecosystem of first- and third-party plugins (pdfHTML, pdfOCR, pdfSweep, etc.) built on a stable extension model.

Enterprise support via Apryse

Backed by Apryse (formerly PDFTron), with dedicated enterprise support contracts and a large sales organization.

Pros and cons

PDFluent
Pros
  • No runtime dependencies
  • WASM support
  • Published price, bought with a card
  • Transparent pricing
Cons
  • iText has AGPL community version (free for open source)
  • iText has a much longer production history
  • Fewer language bindings in PDFluent currently
iText
Pros
  • Free for open source projects under AGPL
  • Very mature, with a long production history
  • Excellent documentation and tutorials
  • Wide language support
Cons
  • Commercial license required for proprietary software
  • Java or C# only — no Rust, no WASM
  • JVM required for iText 7 Java
  • Per-seat licensing model

Which should you choose?

Choose PDFluent

Choose PDFluent if you are building in Rust, need WASM/serverless compatibility, or want a commercial licence at a published yearly price, per organisation instead of per seat.

Choose iText

iText is a solid choice for Java or C# shops, especially when open source AGPL use is acceptable. It has extensive documentation and a large community.

Verdict

Our verdict

If you're building on the JVM and don't need PDF rendering or XFA, iText is a proven choice — especially if you qualify for the AGPL license. If you need PDF rendering, XFA form processing, browser-side processing, or bindings for Python/Node.js, PDFluent covers what iText can't.

SDK · Install

Try it on your own files.

Free under the AGPLv3, or a commercial licence if you would rather not publish your own source.