Compare/Apache PDFBox

PDFluent vs Apache PDFBox

PDFBox is a free, well-documented Java library. It requires a JVM, has a slow cold start, and has only minimal XFA support and no WASM.

Apache PDFBox is a widely used open-source Java library maintained by the Apache Software Foundation. It covers text extraction, form filling, PDF creation, and digital signatures. The main constraints are JVM startup overhead (800 ms–2 s cold), high memory baseline, minimal XFA support, and no WASM target. PDFluent is a native Rust library with a sub-30 ms cold start and a ~6 MB WASM binary (~2 MB Brotli-compressed).

Side-by-side

PDFluent (Rust)
use pdfluent::Document;

fn main() -> pdfluent::Result<()> {
    let doc = Document::open("contract.pdf")?;

    // Extract text
    let text = doc.page(0)?.extract_text()?;
    println!("{}", text);

    // Fill AcroForm field
    let mut form = doc.acroform()?;
    form.set_field("signature_date", "2024-04-14")?;
    form.flatten()?;

    doc.save("contract_signed.pdf")?;
    Ok(())
}
Apache PDFBox (Java)
import org.apache.pdfbox.pdmodel.PDDocument;
import org.apache.pdfbox.text.PDFTextStripper;
import org.apache.pdfbox.pdmodel.interactive.form.PDAcroForm;

public class Example {
    public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
        PDDocument doc = PDDocument.load(new File("contract.pdf"));

        // Extract text
        PDFTextStripper stripper = new PDFTextStripper();
        String text = stripper.getText(doc);
        System.out.println(text);

        // Fill AcroForm field
        PDAcroForm acroForm = doc.getDocumentCatalog().getAcroForm();
        acroForm.getField("signature_date").setValue("2024-04-14");
        acroForm.flatten();

        doc.save("contract_signed.pdf");
        doc.close();
    }
}

Feature comparison

FeaturePDFluentApache PDFBox
Language / runtimeRust, no runtimeJava / JVM required
Cold start< 10 ms800 ms – 2 s (JVM)
Memory baseline15–30 MB200–500 MB (JVM heap)
WASM / browser support
XFA formsLimited
PDF/A validationPartial
Digital signatures (PAdES)
LicenseCommercialApache 2.0 (free)

Pros and cons

PDFluent
  • No JVM required — no cold start, no heap configuration
  • Lower memory baseline (no JVM overhead)
  • WASM support — PDFBox cannot run in a browser
  • No GC pauses affecting latency
  • Simpler deployment — single binary, no classpath
  • PDFBox is Apache-licensed (free forever) — PDFluent requires a commercial license
  • PDFBox has a very large community and many tutorials
  • Some developers prefer Java for its ecosystem
Apache PDFBox
  • Free and open source under Apache 2.0
  • Large community, many Stack Overflow answers
  • Widely used in the Java ecosystem for 15+ years
  • Good text extraction and PDF generation capabilities
  • Requires JVM — 200-500 MB baseline memory even for simple tasks
  • 900 ms+ cold start for first PDF operation
  • No WASM or browser support
  • Limited XFA form support
  • Digital signature support is basic and lacks LTV/PAdES-LTA

When to use each

Choose PDFluent

PDFluent is better when performance matters: high-volume batch processing, serverless environments, or anything where JVM cold start or memory overhead is a problem. Also choose PDFluent if you need XFA support or digital signatures.

Choose Apache PDFBox

Apache PDFBox is a reasonable choice if you already have a Java stack, cost is a constraint (it's free), and throughput requirements are moderate. For basic PDF reading and text extraction in a Java service, PDFBox works well.

Bottom line

PDFBox is a solid choice for JVM-based applications that do not need XFA, WASM, or fast cold starts. It is free and well documented. If your stack is already Java, it works. If you are starting new, need serverless, or need XFA support, PDFluent is a better fit.

Frequently asked questions

Try PDFluent free for 30 days

No credit card. No watermarks. Full SDK access.